Mudit Roadways
Supreme Court of India · 24 November 2023
A warehouse fire claim the insurer refused over the insured location and repair work. The NCDRC and the Supreme Court both sided with the insured.
Read the case studyBy ClearCover · Updated · Decided
The short version: A cold-storage operator claimed under a Deterioration of Stock policy for potatoes that deteriorated in storage. The policy covered deterioration caused by a rise in refrigeration-chamber temperature resulting from specified damage to insured plant and machinery. On 24 January 2022 the Supreme Court ruled for New India Assurance on the policy’s temperature exclusion. The lesson: specialist cover responds only to the mechanism of loss it names.
Shivram Chandra Jagarnath Cold Storage held a Deterioration of Stock policy covering potatoes stored in its facility. The policy covered damage to the stored stock from contamination or deterioration caused by a rise in refrigeration-chamber temperature resulting from specified loss or damage to insured plant and machinery.
Every business has its own mechanism of loss. A cold-storage operator faces refrigeration failure, temperature change, machinery breakdown and deterioration of perishable stock — risks a standard fire policy is not designed around.
Policy
A Deterioration of Stock policy covers potatoes held in the insured’s cold store.
Loss
The stored potatoes deteriorate and a claim is made.
Dispute
The insurer declines the claim on the policy wording.
24 January 2022
The Supreme Court rules in the insurer’s favour on the temperature exclusion.
A deterioration-of-stock policy is narrow by design. It does not insure against all spoilage; it insures against spoilage caused in a particular way. The dispute required the Court to examine the policy wording, including its temperature exclusion, against the circumstances of the claimed deterioration.
On 24 January 2022 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of New India Assurance. The claimed loss was caught by the policy’s temperature exclusion, so the policy did not respond.
Put simply, the policy paid only if deterioration followed the chain of events its wording described, and the claim did not meet that wording. A policy called “deterioration of stock” is not a promise to pay for all deterioration.
India’s cold chain — agricultural storage, food processing, pharmaceuticals and quick commerce — runs through every major business hub, from Bengaluru and Hyderabad to Pune, Ahmedabad, Delhi NCR and Kolkata. Operators often assume a stock or fire policy covers spoilage. This case shows why that assumption should be tested against the wording before a loss, not after.
ClearCover helps Indian businesses evaluate insurance requirements around property, inventory, employee benefits, liability and other commercial risks — including specialist cover such as deterioration of stock and plant and machinery insurance for refrigeration equipment.
These case studies summarise publicly reported court decisions for general information. They are not legal advice and do not replace the judgment itself or advice on your own policy wording. Every outcome turns on its own facts and policy terms. ClearCover is the brand of MDH Insurance, an IRDAI-registered Direct Broker (Registration No. 596).
Supreme Court of India · 24 November 2023
A warehouse fire claim the insurer refused over the insured location and repair work. The NCDRC and the Supreme Court both sided with the insured.
Read the case studyTelangana High Court · 2 January 2025
A turbine incident at a 208 MW power station. Of ₹166.89 crore claimed, ₹17.79 crore survived and the business interruption claim was rejected.
Read the case studyWe map your real causes of loss against the policy trigger, so specialist risks get specialist cover.